Belgium vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Belgium
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Nepal
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Belgium rank
111th
Nepal rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Belgium
- Nepal
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Nepal, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 111th and Nepal ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5217 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.5217 1000 ha | Belgium |
| 2010s | 4.75 1000 ha | 0.0382 1000 ha | 4.71 1000 ha | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0.6293 1000 ha | 0.0097 1000 ha | 0.6197 1000 ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Belgium or Nepal?
- Belgium, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Belgium and Nepal?
- 0 1000 ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Nepal rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Belgium ranks 111th and Nepal ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).