Belgium vs New Zealand: Net Forest conversion — Area
Belgium
0 1000 ha
in 2025
New Zealand
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Belgium rank
97th
New Zealand rank
97th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Belgium
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 97th of 223 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5217 1000 ha | 0.3671 1000 ha | 0.1546 1000 ha | Belgium |
| 2010s | 4.75 1000 ha | 0.2522 1000 ha | 4.49 1000 ha | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0.6293 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.6293 1000 ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Belgium or New Zealand?
- Belgium, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Belgium and New Zealand?
- 0 1000 ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Belgium ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 97th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).