Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Mongolia: Net Forest conversion β Area
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Mongolia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
96th
Mongolia rank
96th
Net Forest conversion β Area over time
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Mongolia
How they compare
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Mongolia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 96th and Mongolia ranks 96th of 217 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 1.2 1000 ha | 1.2 1000 ha | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0.2163 1000 ha | 0.2163 1000 ha | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion β area, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Mongolia?
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion β area between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Mongolia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Mongolia rank globally for net forest conversion β area?
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 96th and Mongolia ranks 96th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion β Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).