Congo vs Israel: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Congo
1 1000 ha
in 2025
Israel
1 1000 ha
in 2025
Congo rank
88th
Israel rank
88th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Congo
- Israel
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1 1000 ha against 1 1000 ha in Israel, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 88th and Israel ranks 88th of 239 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12 1000 ha | 0.1 1000 ha | 11.9 1000 ha | Congo |
| 2000s | 12 1000 ha | 0.01 1000 ha | 11.99 1000 ha | Congo |
| 2010s | 21.73 1000 ha | 2 1000 ha | 19.73 1000 ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 5.15 1000 ha | 1.67 1000 ha | 3.48 1000 ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Congo or Israel?
- Congo, at 1 1000 ha against 1 1000 ha in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Congo and Israel?
- 0 1000 ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Israel?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Israel rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Congo ranks 88th and Israel ranks 88th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).