Croatia vs Mayotte: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Croatia
0.112 1000 ha
in 2025
Mayotte
0.062 1000 ha
in 2025
Croatia rank
101st
Mayotte rank
104th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Croatia
- Mayotte
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.112 1000 ha against 0.062 1000 ha in Mayotte, a difference of 0.05 1000 ha.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.8 times Mayotte's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 101st and Mayotte ranks 104th of 239 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Mayotte in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.07 1000 ha | 0.458 1000 ha | 0.613 1000 ha | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.7155 1000 ha | 0.4544 1000 ha | 0.2611 1000 ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.0804 1000 ha | 0.1158 1000 ha | 0.0354 1000 ha | Mayotte |
| 2020s | 0.0987 1000 ha | 0.0643 1000 ha | 0.0343 1000 ha | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Croatia or Mayotte?
- Croatia, at 0.112 1000 ha against 0.062 1000 ha in Mayotte as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Croatia and Mayotte?
- 0.05 1000 ha, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mayotte?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Mayotte rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Croatia ranks 101st and Mayotte ranks 104th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).