Cuba vs Jamaica: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1

Cuba
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Jamaica
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Cuba rank
111th
Jamaica rank
111th

Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time

  • Cuba
  • Jamaica
01234199020072025

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Jamaica, a difference of 0 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 111th and Jamaica ranks 111th of 239 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Jamaica Difference Ahead
1990s 1.07 1000 ha 0.058 1000 ha 1.02 1000 ha Cuba
2000s 0.1075 1000 ha 0.0058 1000 ha 0.1017 1000 ha Cuba
2010s 1.75 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 1.75 1000 ha Cuba
2020s 0.73 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0.73 1000 ha Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Cuba or Jamaica?
Cuba, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Jamaica as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Cuba and Jamaica?
0 1000 ha, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jamaica?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Cuba and Jamaica rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
Cuba ranks 111th and Jamaica ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).