Dominican Republic vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area
Dominican Republic
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
97th
Latvia rank
97th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Dominican Republic
- Latvia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 97th and Latvia ranks 97th of 223 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 4.21 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 4.21 1000 ha | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 5.57 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | 7.84 1000 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.65 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | 1.23 1000 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Dominican Republic or Latvia?
- Dominican Republic, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Dominican Republic and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Dominican Republic ranks 97th and Latvia ranks 97th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).