Ecuador vs Ethiopia: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Ecuador
30.15 1000 ha
in 2025
Ethiopia
24.48 1000 ha
in 2025
Ecuador rank
41st
Ethiopia rank
44th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Ecuador
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 30.15 1000 ha against 24.48 1000 ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 5.67 1000 ha.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 41st and Ethiopia ranks 44th of 239 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.74 1000 ha | 91.73 1000 ha | 1.01 1000 ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 73.79 1000 ha | 91.74 1000 ha | 17.95 1000 ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 60.94 1000 ha | 61.53 1000 ha | 0.5922 1000 ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 37.07 1000 ha | 26.77 1000 ha | 10.3 1000 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Ecuador or Ethiopia?
- Ecuador, at 30.15 1000 ha against 24.48 1000 ha in Ethiopia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Ecuador and Ethiopia?
- 5.67 1000 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ethiopia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Ethiopia rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Ecuador ranks 41st and Ethiopia ranks 44th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).