Ecuador vs Uganda: Net Forest conversion — Area
Ecuador
30.15 1000 ha
in 2025
Uganda
37.93 1000 ha
in 2025
Ecuador rank
36th
Uganda rank
34th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Ecuador
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 37.93 1000 ha against 30.15 1000 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 7.78 1000 ha.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 223 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.74 1000 ha | 124.56 1000 ha | 31.82 1000 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 73.79 1000 ha | 66.44 1000 ha | 7.34 1000 ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 60.94 1000 ha | 51.17 1000 ha | 9.78 1000 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 37.07 1000 ha | 37.93 1000 ha | 0.8687 1000 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Ecuador or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 37.93 1000 ha against 30.15 1000 ha in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Ecuador and Uganda?
- 7.78 1000 ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uganda?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Uganda rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Ecuador ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).