Egypt vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area
Egypt
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Egypt rank
96th
Latvia rank
96th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Egypt
- Latvia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 96th of 217 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Egypt or Latvia?
- Egypt, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Egypt and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Egypt ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 96th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).