French Polynesia vs Kiribati: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1

French Polynesia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kiribati
0 1000 ha
in 2025
French Polynesia rank
111th
Kiribati rank
111th

Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Kiribati
00.20.40.60.81199020072025

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0 1000 ha.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 111th and Kiribati ranks 111th of 239 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2000s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2010s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2020s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, French Polynesia or Kiribati?
French Polynesia, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between French Polynesia and Kiribati?
0 1000 ha, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Kiribati?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do French Polynesia and Kiribati rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
French Polynesia ranks 111th and Kiribati ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).