Grenada vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Grenada
0 1000 ha
in 2025
South Sudan
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Grenada rank
111th
South Sudan rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Grenada
- South Sudan
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 14 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 111th and South Sudan ranks 111th of 239 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 0.48 1000 ha | 0.48 1000 ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0.16 1000 ha | 0.16 1000 ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Grenada or South Sudan?
- Grenada, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Grenada and South Sudan?
- 0 1000 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Grenada ranks 111th and South Sudan ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).