Haiti vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1

Haiti
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Haiti rank
111th
Latvia rank
111th

Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time

  • Haiti
  • Latvia
051015199020072025

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Haiti ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 239 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2000s 0.36 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0.36 1000 ha Haiti
2010s 1.63 1000 ha 13.41 1000 ha 11.78 1000 ha Latvia
2020s 0 1000 ha 2.89 1000 ha 2.89 1000 ha Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Haiti or Latvia?
Haiti, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Haiti and Latvia?
0 1000 ha, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Latvia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Haiti and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
Haiti ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).