Holy See vs Kenya: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Holy See
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kenya
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Holy See rank
111th
Kenya rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Holy See
- Kenya
How they compare
Holy See currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kenya, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Holy See ranks 111th and Kenya ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Holy See | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 49.46 1000 ha | 49.46 1000 ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Holy See or Kenya?
- Holy See, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Holy See and Kenya?
- 0 1000 ha, with Holy See ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Holy See and Kenya?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Holy See and Kenya rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Holy See ranks 111th and Kenya ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).