Holy See vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area
Holy See
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Holy See rank
96th
Latvia rank
96th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Holy See
- Latvia
How they compare
Holy See currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Holy See ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 96th of 217 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Holy See | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Holy See or Latvia?
- Holy See, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Holy See and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Holy See ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Holy See and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Holy See and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Holy See ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 96th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).