Holy See vs Palau: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Holy See
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Palau
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Holy See rank
111th
Palau rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Holy See
- Palau
How they compare
Holy See currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Palau, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Holy See ranks 111th and Palau ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Holy See | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Holy See or Palau?
- Holy See, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Palau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Holy See and Palau?
- 0 1000 ha, with Holy See ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Holy See and Palau?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Holy See and Palau rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Holy See ranks 111th and Palau ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).