Iceland vs Nauru: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Iceland
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Nauru
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Iceland rank
111th
Nauru rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Iceland
- Nauru
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Nauru, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 111th and Nauru ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Iceland or Nauru?
- Iceland, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Iceland and Nauru?
- 0 1000 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nauru?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Nauru rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Iceland ranks 111th and Nauru ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).