Ireland vs Kiribati: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1

Ireland
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kiribati
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Ireland rank
111th
Kiribati rank
111th

Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time

  • Ireland
  • Kiribati
00.020.040.06199020072025

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.

Ireland ranks 111th and Kiribati ranks 111th of 239 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2000s 0.0576 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0.0576 1000 ha Ireland
2010s 0.0064 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0.0064 1000 ha Ireland
2020s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Ireland or Kiribati?
Ireland, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Ireland and Kiribati?
0 1000 ha, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Kiribati?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ireland and Kiribati rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
Ireland ranks 111th and Kiribati ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).