Kazakhstan vs Liechtenstein: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Kazakhstan
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Liechtenstein
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
111th
Liechtenstein rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Kazakhstan
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 111th and Liechtenstein ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.71 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 1.71 1000 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 7.76 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 7.76 1000 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 3.2 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 3.2 1000 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Kazakhstan or Liechtenstein?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Liechtenstein as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Kazakhstan and Liechtenstein?
- 0 1000 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Liechtenstein?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Liechtenstein rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Kazakhstan ranks 111th and Liechtenstein ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).