Kenya vs Malta: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Kenya
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Malta
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kenya rank
111th
Malta rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Kenya
- Malta
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Malta, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Kenya ranks 111th and Malta ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 49.46 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 49.46 1000 ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Kenya or Malta?
- Kenya, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Kenya and Malta?
- 0 1000 ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Malta?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Malta rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Kenya ranks 111th and Malta ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).