Kenya vs Uzbekistan: Net Forest conversion — Area
Kenya
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Uzbekistan
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kenya rank
96th
Uzbekistan rank
96th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Kenya
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Kenya ranks 96th and Uzbekistan ranks 96th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 5.41 1000 ha | 5.41 1000 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 49.46 1000 ha | 0.6016 1000 ha | 48.86 1000 ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Kenya or Uzbekistan?
- Kenya, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Kenya and Uzbekistan?
- 0 1000 ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Uzbekistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Uzbekistan rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Kenya ranks 96th and Uzbekistan ranks 96th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).