Kuwait vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Kuwait
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kuwait rank
111th
Latvia rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Kuwait
- Latvia
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | 13.41 1000 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | 2.89 1000 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Kuwait or Latvia?
- Kuwait, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Kuwait and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Kuwait and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Kuwait ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).