Latvia vs Mongolia: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Latvia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Mongolia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Latvia rank
111th
Mongolia rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Latvia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Mongolia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mongolia ahead.
Latvia ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 8.81 1000 ha | 8.81 1000 ha | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 8.08 1000 ha | 8.08 1000 ha | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 13.41 1000 ha | 1.88 1000 ha | 11.53 1000 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2.89 1000 ha | 0.2163 1000 ha | 2.67 1000 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Latvia or Mongolia?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Latvia and Mongolia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mongolia rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Latvia ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).