Lithuania vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Lithuania
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Lithuania rank
111th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Lithuania
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 111th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.58 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 3.58 1000 ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Lithuania or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- Lithuania, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Lithuania and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 0 1000 ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Lithuania ranks 111th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).