Mauritius vs Nauru: Net Forest conversion — Area
Mauritius
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Nauru
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Mauritius rank
111th
Nauru rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Mauritius
- Nauru
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Nauru, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.
Mauritius ranks 111th and Nauru ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0.3213 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.3213 1000 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.0425 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.0425 1000 ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.0003 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.0003 1000 ha | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Mauritius or Nauru?
- Mauritius, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Mauritius and Nauru?
- 0 1000 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nauru?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Nauru rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Mauritius ranks 111th and Nauru ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).