Russian Federation vs Rwanda: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Russian Federation
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Rwanda
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
111th
Rwanda rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Russian Federation
- Rwanda
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 111th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.27 1000 ha | 4.35 1000 ha | 43.93 1000 ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 4.83 1000 ha | 2.39 1000 ha | 2.44 1000 ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 0.2171 1000 ha | 0.2171 1000 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Russian Federation or Rwanda?
- Russian Federation, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Russian Federation and Rwanda?
- 0 1000 ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Russian Federation and Rwanda rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Russian Federation ranks 111th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).