Rwanda vs Serbia: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Rwanda
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Serbia
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Rwanda rank
111th
Serbia rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Serbia, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 111th and Serbia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.17 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 2.17 1000 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.2171 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.2171 1000 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 0 1000 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Rwanda ranks 111th and Serbia ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).