South Sudan vs Spain: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
South Sudan
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Spain
0 1000 ha
in 2025
South Sudan rank
111th
Spain rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- South Sudan
- Spain
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Spain, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Spain ahead.
South Sudan ranks 111th and Spain ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.48 1000 ha | 1.39 1000 ha | 0.909 1000 ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 0.16 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0.16 1000 ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, South Sudan or Spain?
- South Sudan, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Spain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between South Sudan and Spain?
- 0 1000 ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Spain?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Spain rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- South Sudan ranks 111th and Spain ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).