Angola vs Bhutan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Angola
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Bhutan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Angola rank
6th
Bhutan rank
8th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Angola
- Bhutan
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 6th and Bhutan ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Angola or Bhutan?
- Angola, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Angola and Bhutan?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bhutan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Bhutan rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 6th and Bhutan ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.