Angola vs Brazil: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Angola
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Brazil
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Angola rank
6th
Brazil rank
5th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Angola
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Angola, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.
Angola ranks 6th and Brazil ranks 5th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Angola or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Angola and Brazil?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Brazil?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Brazil rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 6th and Brazil ranks 5th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.