Angola vs Guyana: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Angola
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Guyana
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Angola rank
6th
Guyana rank
9th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Angola
- Guyana
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Guyana, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Guyana's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 6th and Guyana ranks 9th of 191 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Angola or Guyana?
- Angola, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Guyana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Angola and Guyana?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guyana?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Guyana rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 6th and Guyana ranks 9th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.