Bhutan vs Brazil: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Bhutan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Brazil
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Bhutan rank
8th
Brazil rank
5th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 8th and Brazil ranks 5th of 191 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Bhutan or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Bhutan and Brazil?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Brazil?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Brazil rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 8th and Brazil ranks 5th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.