Brazil vs Canada: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Brazil
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Canada
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
5th
Canada rank
7th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Canada
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Canada, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 5th and Canada ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Brazil or Canada?
- Brazil, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Canada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Brazil and Canada?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Canada?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Canada rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 5th and Canada ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.