China vs Indonesia: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
China
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Indonesia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
China rank
87th
Indonesia rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- China
- Indonesia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Indonesia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 87th and Indonesia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, China or Indonesia?
- China, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between China and Indonesia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Indonesia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and Indonesia rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- China ranks 87th and Indonesia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.