Congo vs Cyprus: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Congo
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Cyprus
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Congo rank
74th
Cyprus rank
76th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Congo
- Cyprus
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Cyprus, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Cyprus's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 74th and Cyprus ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Congo or Cyprus?
- Congo, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Cyprus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Congo and Cyprus?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cyprus?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Cyprus rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Congo ranks 74th and Cyprus ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.