Croatia vs Libya: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Croatia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Libya
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Croatia rank
83rd
Libya rank
81st
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Croatia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.6 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 83rd and Libya ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Croatia or Libya?
- Libya, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Croatia and Libya?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Libya rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 83rd and Libya ranks 81st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.