Cyprus vs Japan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Cyprus
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Japan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Cyprus rank
76th
Japan rank
79th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Cyprus
- Japan
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Japan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.8 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Cyprus ranks 76th and Japan ranks 79th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Cyprus or Japan?
- Cyprus, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Cyprus and Japan?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Japan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cyprus and Japan rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Cyprus ranks 76th and Japan ranks 79th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.