Denmark vs Jordan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Denmark
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Jordan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Denmark rank
87th
Jordan rank
86th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Denmark
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Denmark, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jordan ahead.
Denmark ranks 87th and Jordan ranks 86th of 191 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Denmark or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Denmark as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Denmark and Jordan?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Jordan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Jordan rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Denmark ranks 87th and Jordan ranks 86th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.