Guatemala vs Samoa: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Guatemala
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Samoa
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Guatemala rank
40th
Samoa rank
39th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 40th and Samoa ranks 39th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Guatemala or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Guatemala as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Guatemala and Samoa?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Samoa?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Samoa rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 40th and Samoa ranks 39th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.