Hungary vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Hungary
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Hungary rank
87th
Latvia rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Hungary
- Latvia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Hungary or Latvia?
- Hungary, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Hungary and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.