Jamaica vs Portugal: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Jamaica
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Portugal
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Jamaica rank
87th
Portugal rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Portugal
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 87th and Portugal ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Jamaica or Portugal?
- Jamaica, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Jamaica and Portugal?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Portugal?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and Portugal rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 87th and Portugal ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.