Jordan vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Jordan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Jordan rank
86th
Latvia rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Latvia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Jordan ranks 86th and Latvia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Jordan or Latvia?
- Jordan, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Jordan and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 86th and Latvia ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.