Latvia vs Portugal: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Latvia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Portugal
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
87th
Portugal rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Portugal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Latvia ranks 87th and Portugal ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Latvia or Portugal?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Latvia and Portugal?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Portugal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Portugal rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 87th and Portugal ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.