Libya vs Morocco: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Libya
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Morocco
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Libya rank
81st
Morocco rank
80th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Libya
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Libya, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Morocco ahead.
Libya ranks 81st and Morocco ranks 80th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Morocco |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Libya or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Libya and Morocco?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Morocco?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Morocco rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Libya ranks 81st and Morocco ranks 80th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.