Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Malaysia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Malaysia rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
31st
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malaysia ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Malaysia, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Malaysia ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.