Namibia vs Tunisia: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Namibia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Tunisia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Namibia rank
71st
Tunisia rank
72nd
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Namibia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 71st and Tunisia ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Namibia or Tunisia?
- Namibia, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Namibia and Tunisia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Tunisia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Tunisia rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Namibia ranks 71st and Tunisia ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.