Nigeria vs Togo: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Nigeria
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Togo
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Nigeria rank
60th
Togo rank
63rd
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Nigeria
- Togo
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Togo, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.4 times Togo's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 60th and Togo ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Nigeria or Togo?
- Nigeria, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Nigeria and Togo?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Togo?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Nigeria and Togo rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Nigeria ranks 60th and Togo ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.