Norway vs Togo: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Norway
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Togo
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Norway rank
65th
Togo rank
63rd
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Norway
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Norway, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.
Norway ranks 65th and Togo ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Norway or Togo?
- Togo, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Norway and Togo?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Togo?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Togo rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Norway ranks 65th and Togo ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.