Samoa vs Thailand: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Samoa
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Thailand
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Samoa rank
39th
Thailand rank
41st
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Samoa
- Thailand
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Thailand, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 39th and Thailand ranks 41st of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Samoa |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Samoa |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Samoa or Thailand?
- Samoa, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Samoa and Thailand?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Thailand?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Samoa and Thailand rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Samoa ranks 39th and Thailand ranks 41st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.