Slovenia vs Togo: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Slovenia
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Togo
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Slovenia rank
62nd
Togo rank
63rd
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Slovenia
- Togo
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Togo, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Togo ahead.
Slovenia ranks 62nd and Togo ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Slovenia or Togo?
- Slovenia, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Slovenia and Togo?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Slovenia and Togo rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Slovenia ranks 62nd and Togo ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.